There are also numerous proponents of the abortion issue, who believe that there is nothing wrong about it and it is a personal matter of every modern woman whether to keep the unborn baby or not. Such individual point on numerous incidents of rape or incest which sometimes simply require abortion as a salvation from the situation. Also, they say that some pregnant women choose abortion since they are not ready for motherhood or do not have funds to rise the child properly. These are quite strong pro arguments which should also be mentioned in any academic paper on abortion.
Specialists underline that the main discussion and the main arguments are based on the controversy if a fetus should be considered a person or not. Those who take an unborn baby as a person say that abortion should be equal to a murder, that is why it should be banned. Those people who do no consider fetus a person say that it is a personal matter of the expecting mother to make a decision. Who is right and who is wrong in this public discussion? Try to look for more of interesting related materials and find an answer while working on your argumentative essay on abortion.
The new measure fits the pattern of a series of restrictions promoted by anti-abortion advocates, who seek to discourage women from undergoing an abortion by limiting access. While initiatives to overturn Roe vs. Wade — the 1973 court order that struck down many laws banning abortion — have broadly failed, measures such as requiring parental consent and mandatory waiting periods in many states across the United States.
The issue of abortion is one of the most commonly used as a topic for academic argumentative papers. Definitely, abortion is a very sensitive issue from the moral and ethical points of view, and there are numerous proponents and opponents of abortions in the US. Writing an academic paper on abortion can give the writer a great field for arguing and discussing numerous pros and cons of this controversial issue. At the same time, writing argumentative essay on abortion can help author formulate own point of view on this problem and demonstrate own opinion and position regarding abortion legalization.
Many people consider abortion as a cruel, unnatural, and absolutely immoral human act, that is why they are arguing for banning abortions. They qualify it as a murder of an unborn child and argue for launching criminal responsibility to those who intend to do abortion. They are convinced that such thing as abortion can never be considered ethical and it infringes all moral norms and postulates on which our society is based. They believe that abortions as a concept is very unhealthy and even dangerous to normal development of our social life. Those are the most important con factors which can be mentioned when working on argumentative essay on abortion.
In sum, a woman surely can defend her life against the threat to it posed by the unborn child, even if doing so involves its death. And this shows not merely that the theses in (1) through (4) are false; it shows also that the extreme view of abortion is false, and so we need not canvass any other possible ways of arriving at it from the argument I mentioned at the outset.
In this case, of course, youwere kidnapped, you didn't volunteer for the operation that plugged theviolinist into your kidneys. Can those who oppose abortion on the ground Imentioned make an exception for a pregnancy due to rape? Certainly. They cansay that persons have a right to life only if they didn't come into existencebecause of rape; or they can say that all persons have a right to life, butthat some have less of a right to life than others, in particular, that thosewho came into existence because of rape have less. But these statements have arather unpleasant sound. Surely the question of whether you have a right tolife at all, or how much of it you have, shouldn't turn on the question ofwhether or not you are a product of a rape. And in fact the people who opposeabortion on the ground I mentioned do not make this distinction, and hence donot make an exception in case of rape.
The extreme view could of course be weakened to say that while abortion is permissible to save the mother's life, it may not be performed by a third party, but only by the mother herself. But this cannot be right either. For what we have to keep in mind is that the mother and the unborn child are not like two tenants in a small house which has, by an unfortunate mistake, been rented to both: the mother owns the house. The fact that she does adds to the offensiveness of deducing that the mother can do nothing from the supposition that third parties can do nothing. But it does more than this: it casts a bright light on the supposition that third parties can do nothing. Certainly it lets us see that a third party who says "I cannot choose between you" is fooling himself if he thinks this is impartiality. If Jones has found and fastened on a certain coat, which he needs to keep him from freezing, but which Smith also needs to keep him from freezing, then it is not impartiality that says "I cannot choose between you" when Smith owns the coat. Women have said again and again "This body is my body!" and they have reason to feel angry, reason to feel that it has been like shouting into the wind. Smith, after all, is hardly likely to bless us if we say to him, "Of course it's your coat, anybody would grant that it is. But no one may choose between you and Jones who is to have it."
I suppose that in some viewsof human life the mother's body is only on loan to her, the loan not being onewhich gives her any prior claim to it. One who held this view might well thinkit impartiality to say "I cannot choose." But I shall simply ignorethis possibility. My own view is that if a human being has any just, priorclaim to anything at all, he has a just, prior claim to his own body. Andperhaps this needn't be argued for here anyway, since, as I mentioned, thearguments against abortion we are looking at do grant that the woman has aright to decide what happens in and to her body. But although they do grant it,I have tried to show that they do not take seriously what is done in granting it.I suggest the same thing will reappear even more clearly when we turn away fromcases in which the mother's life is at stake, and attend, as I propose we nowdo, to the vastly more common cases in which a woman wants an abortion for someless weighty reason than preserving her own life.
Right to life against abortion argumentative essay Pleasant River Garden Club Abortion For And Against Essay Page Persuasive On Brefash Catechism Of The Catholic Church Against Abortion
The difficulty I point tohere is not peculiar to the right of life. It reappears in connection with allthe other natural rights, and it is something which an adequate account ofrights must deal with. For present purposes it is enough just to draw attentionto it. But I would stress that I am not arguing that people do not have a rightto life--quite to the contrary, it seems to me that the primary control we mustplace on the acceptability of an account of rights is that it should turn outin that account to be a truth that all persons have a right to life. I amarguing only that having a right to life does not guarantee having either aright to be given the use of or a right to be allowed continued use of anotherperson s body--even if one needs it for life itself. So the right to life willnot serve the opponents of abortion in the very simple and clear way in whichthey seem to have thought it would.