The individualist anarchists are inclined to maintain private propertyas a necessary condition of individual independence, without fully answering the question of how property could be maintained withoutcourts and police.Actually, Tucker and Spooner both wrote about the free market's abilityto provide legal and protection services, so Landauer's remark was notaccurate even in 1959.
(The anarcho-capitalist shares Kropotkin's interest incustomary law, but normally believes that it requiresextensive modernization and articulation.) The anarcho-capitalist typically hails modern society'sincreasing reliance on private security guards, gatedcommunities, , and otherdemonstrations of the free market's ability to supply thedefensive and legal services normally assumed to be ofnecessity a government monopoly.
In light of the prophetic accuracy of Bakunin'sprediction in this area, Marx's reply is almost ironic: "Undercollective ownership the so-called people's will disappearsto make way for the real will of the cooperative." It is on thispoint that most left-anarchists reasonably claim completevindication; just as Bakunin predicted, the Marxist"dictatorship of the proletariat" swiftly became a ruthless"dictatorship the proletariat."Finally, Marx stated that the anarchists erroneously believedthat the government supported the capitalist system ratherthan the other way around.
We, on the contrary,say: Do away with capital, the concentration of the means ofproduction in the hands of the few, and the state will fall ofitself." The left-anarchist would probably accept this as afair assessment of their disagreement with the Marxists, butpoint out how in many historical cases since (and before)Marx's time governments have steered their countriestowards very different aims and policies, whereas capitalistsare often fairly adaptive and passive.
This might interest you:
"Complex Systems and Anarchism
by Gavin Mendel-Gleeson
Red and Black Revolution #15 (Ireland)
Analysing human societies as complex systems can provide an insight into historical processes and the strengths and weaknesses of capitalism Complex systems theory is a scientific theory coming out of a tradition of catastrophe theory, chaos theory, control theory, and especially cybernetics. Complex systems theory arises as a rejection of the traditional programme of reductionist science. It rejects reductionism as being both unnecessary and intractable."
The next morning the president of France finds himself ruling apeaceful but empty landscape, the population having been reduced tohimself, three generals, and twenty-seven war correspondents." (Moreover, anarcho-capitalists argue, the Mafia can onlythrive in the artificial market niche created by the prohibitionof alcohol, drugs, prostitution, gambling, and othervictimless crimes.
Chaos, with reference to chaos theory, refers to an apparent lack of order in a system that nevertheless obeys particular laws or rules; this understanding of chaos is synonymous with dynamical instability, a condition discovered by the physicist Henri Poincare in the early 20th century that refers to an inherent lack of predictability in some physical systems....
In the 20th century, the war of words ended inblows: while Marxist-Leninists sometimes cooperated withanarchists during the early stages of the Russian andSpanish revolutions, violent struggle between them was therule rather than the exception.
There’s not as much to laugh about. But lest you forget, back in the day, there was a very different tone to Sons of Anarchy: It was fun and often very funny. The show’s early sense of humor, in fact, is what hooked so many of us: SAMCRO may have been bad- ass murderers and thugs, but they had a good time with it. There was more camaraderie and less backstabbing. There were more jokes and less murders. It’s not necessarily better or worse, but Sons of Anarchy is definitely a different show than it once was. So, before Kurt Sutter and the gang sign off for one final time tonight, let’s take a quick look back at some of the funniest moments in a series beset with tragedy.
The government's claim to defend privateproperty is thus quite ironic, for the state, in Rothbard'swords, is "an institution that presumes to 'defend' personand property by itself subsisting on the unilateral coercionagainst private property known as taxation." Other anarcho-capitalists such as David Friedman find these argumentsfrom natural Lockean rights unconvincing, and instead takeup the task of trying to show that Adam Smith's utilitariancase for free-market capitalism applies just as well to freemarkets in defense services, making the state useless aswell as dangerous.
Although the manifesto concentrates on statistics primarily whereas, the 2012 report talks about the various success factors of an executive sponsor as leadership plays a crucial role in deciding the success or failure of a project....
The protesters thought the United States should NOT be in the criminal practices of the UN, WTO, WHO, FAO, CAC, and specifically the trade agreements with the SPP including CAFTA, NAFTA, and GATT (of which Obama used to secure the Labor Union's voters by promising to GET THEM OUT OF these treasonous trade agreements). The same is true for many other events like G8 & G20; the fake anarchists wear NEW black clothes still with creases from factory folding, they wear police issue military boots, and the cowards always cover their faces because they're afraid of being documented as traitors.
(Asusual, it is the inefficiency rather than the injustice thateconomists focus upon.)Left-anarchists and anarcho-capitalists would probably haveremarkably similar replies to this argument, althoughdoubtlessly the tone and emphasis would vary.