Assignments got your hair on fire?

Douse the flames with our full-range writing service!

Experienced academic writing professionals are at your fingertips. Use this handy tool to get a price estimate for your project.

In law enforcement discretion is left up to each ..

The job of the police officer is to enforce the law, not to make it or determine the guilt or innocence of anyone. It is inappropriate for officers to use "discretion" when determining whether to apply the law or not. This is a form of corruption. There are far too many cases of officers in the country applying the law in a non uniform manner. Whether it is letting friends and family off the hook for a speeding violation or harshly treating a young male driver who looks suspicious, unequal treatment cannot be accepted. As far as the comment on speeding violations is concerned, if you speed you should pay the fine. It shouldn't be a matter of whether the officer catches you or not or decides to let you go because you were polite and had no record. They get around this in Germany by having traffic cameras set up. You speed, they take a picture, you pay the fine. No issues. Even better solution. Put a GPS in every car. It will know where you are, what speed you are going and whether you were speeding or not, then send you a ticket. No more games of trying to evade the law.

I disagree with the premise of this article. Legislatures make laws, Judges interpret them, the police enforce them. That is how the system is designed and is supposed to work. If there is any "discretion" in the system, it is at the interpretation level with judges. It pains me everyday to hear how some get out of traffic citations, while others don't. There are many reasons this happens, but it is all to common to find pretty young women getting off with warnings at a much higher rate. This is not even the "discretion" espoused by the article's writer, but the "discrimination" mentioned by an earlier poster. This example is just a microcosm of what happens when officers take on duties not assigned to their role in the legal system; discretion becomes discrimination.

Video embedded · Police Discretion: Definition, Examples, Pros & Cons

Discretion in law enforcement essays ..

What does discretion mean in law

Investigators should be aware that it may be more difficult to recognize sex stereotyping when it affects an employer’s evaluation of a worker’s general competence than when it leads to assumptions about how a worker will balance work and caregiving responsibilities. Such stereotyping can be based on unconscious bias, particularly where officials engage in subjective decisionmaking. As with other forms of gender stereotyping, comparative evidence showing more favorable treatment of male caregivers than female caregivers is helpful but not necessary to establish a violation. Investigators should be particularly attentive, for example, to evidence of the following:

I fear the word "discretion". It's way too close to another "d" word....discrimination. Is discretion what was used when the prominent political figure who is white was found drunk with his vehicle disabled, knocking things over in a Saline store? Discretion told the police to let him go "after he sobered up". Same thing would have happened if he was a young black man out of Detroit visiting Saline in the same condition, right? discretion - the power or right to decide or act according to one's own judgment; freedom of judgment or choice: It is entirely within my discretion whether I will go or stay. the quality of being discreet, esp. with reference to one's own actions or speech; prudence or decorum: Throwing all discretion to the winds, he blurted out the truth. discrimination - treatment or consideration of, or making a distinction in favor of or against, a person or thing based on the group, class, or category to which that person or thing belongs rather than on individual merit. Discretion is certainly defended in your article. But we must know that every police officer will use discretion with no preconceived bias. Do we know that? Not saying the article is right or wrong. Just saying, it's something for all of us to think about. Thanks.

Discretion in law enforcement essays

Those of you who do not like "discretion", the next time you get stopped by the cops for speeding or whatever, do not ask for a break. Also, if there was no discretion, then once you hit 26 mph in a 25 mph zone, you would get a ticket. I bet you would complain about that.

Discretion in Law Enforcement Term Paper 110779

I think the reason people are so talkative about this isn't the concept of police using their discretion, that's common sense. The issue is that this idea is presented as if there's no discrimination, no corruption, and no unfair enforcement. That's the real matter at hand, how to allow the police to apply their discretion without allowing them to take advantage of it. What oversight would be required? What transparency? That's the part of this discussion that would lead to improvements in policing and life in the community. And the old adage of a few bad apples spoiling the bunch is usually misapplied when discussing police abuses, in case anybody wanted to bring that up; usually it's stated as some sort of excuse, explaining away the few bad apples without condemning the rest, but in reality that statement condemns the entire system based on the actions of a few bad cops.

Versatile Services that Make Studying Easy
We write effective, thought-provoking essays from scratch
We create erudite academic research papers
We champion seasoned experts for dissertations
We make it our business to construct successful business papers
What if the quality isn’t so great?
Our writers are sourced from experts, and complete an obstacle course of testing to join our brigade. Ours is a top service in the English-speaking world.
How do I know the professor won’t find out?
Everything is confidential. So you know your student paper is wholly yours, we use CopyScape and WriteCheck to guarantee originality (never TurnItIn, which professors patrol).
What if it doesn’t meet my expectations?
Unchanged instructions afford you 10 days to request edits after our agreed due date. With 94% satisfaction, we work until your hair is comfortably cool.
Clients enjoy the breezy experience of working with us
Click to learn our proven method

A discussion on the use of discretion in law enforcement.


Law Essay Questions - UK Essays | UKEssays

In your opinion when is discretion and selective enforcement of the law most prevalent?
Is the case provided above police discretion or preferential treatment for certain member of the community?
Do you believe the outcome would have been different if the individual pulled over for the investigative stop was black?
How does police education fit into the use of discretion?
Paragraph 3: Construct a coherent argument for or against the use of deadly force by police. Please make sure you understand the meaning of deadly force as used in the text. Under what circumstances do you think police are justified in using deadly force?
The common law rule page 186 of your text.
The North Carolina Rule page 186 of your text.
Current general rule page 186 of your text.
Any combination of these.
Other circumstances that you believe to be necessary for deadly force.
Paragraph 4: Locate one (1) contemporary (less than two years old) of police using deadly force where the suspect dies and conclude whether or not you think the use of force was proper and justified under the Current general rule for the use of deadly force on page 186. You may use newspaper articles, Internet, etc. You must have at least one (1) source outside of the text. However, to fully explain your answer you may need more than one (1) source to get the full story as it unfolds. Make sure you look up the outcome for the officer(s) involved in the deadly force incident. You may not use any case from the book. Discuss the following about your case.
Write a detailed summary of the case without plagiarizing.
Based on what you have learned in the chapter and the research discuss whether you feel excessive force was used in this case or was it an appropriate use of deadly force. Be specific and relate the material to the Current general rule on the use of deadly force giving quotes from the research to make your point.
Paragraph 5: Today police officers are not always given an opportunity to diffuse a situation without the use of deadly force. In the History of Homicide class, which I teach online, we see that this is particularly true in mass murder events. We also call this victim precipitate homicide. In these situations, it is more likely that the perpetrator will commit Suicide by Cop or suicide than choose to remain alive. The problem faced by the police officer is two-fold. How does the police officer know that the victim really wants to commit suicide? Secondly, making the wrong choice or even having to kill the victim causes stress on the police officer.
Conduct research and write a paragraph discussing some of the effects Suicide by Cop can have for the officer(s) involved.
Locate a case that is clearly a case of Suicide by Cop as described in Category 1 or Category 2 in the article Suicide by Cop. (Links to an external site.)
Write a detailed summary of the case without plagiarizing.
Based on what you have learned in the chapter and the research discuss whether you feel this is a Category 1 or Category 2 case. Be specific and explain your choice by using quotes from the research to make your point.

professional essay on Community Law Enforcement and Discretion

Although some employment decisions that adversely affect caregivers may not constitute unlawful discrimination based on sex or another protected characteristic, the Commission strongly encourages employers to adopt best practices to make it easier for all workers, whether male or female, to balance work and personal responsibilities. There is substantial evidence that workplace flexibility enhances employee satisfaction and job performance. Thus, employers can benefit by adopting such flexible workplace polices by, for example, saving millions of dollars in retention costs.

Full enforcement police discretion essay | MNT

In your opinion when is discretion and selective enforcement of the law most prevalent?
Is the case provided above police discretion or preferential treatment for certain member of the community?
Do you believe the outcome would have been different if the individual pulled over for the investigative stop was black?
How does police education fit into the use of discretion?
Paragraph 3: Construct a coherent argument for or against the use of deadly force by police. Please make sure you understand the meaning of deadly force as used in the text. Under what circumstances do you think police are justified in using deadly force?
The common law rule page 186 of your text.
The North Carolina Rule page 186 of your text.
Current general rule page 186 of your text.
Any combination of these.
Other circumstances that you believe to be necessary for deadly force.
Paragraph 4: Locate one (1) contemporary (less than two years old) of police using deadly force where the suspect dies and conclude whether or not you think the use of force was proper and justified under the Current general rule for the use of deadly force on page 186. You may use newspaper articles, Internet, etc. You must have at least one (1) source outside of the text. However, to fully explain your answer you may need more than one (1) source to get the full story as it unfolds. Make sure you look up the outcome for the officer(s) involved in the deadly force incident. You may not use any case from the book. Discuss the following about your case.
Write a detailed summary of the case without plagiarizing.
Based on what you have learned in the chapter and the research discuss whether you feel excessive force was used in this case or was it an appropriate use of deadly force. Be specific and relate the material to the Current general rule on the use of deadly force giving quotes from the research to make your point.
Paragraph 5: Today police officers are not always given an opportunity to diffuse a situation without the use of deadly force. In the History of Homicide class, which I teach online, we see that this is particularly true in mass murder events. We also call this victim precipitate homicide. In these situations, it is more likely that the perpetrator will commit Suicide by Cop or suicide than choose to remain alive. The problem faced by the police officer is two-fold. How does the police officer know that the victim really wants to commit suicide? Secondly, making the wrong choice or even having to kill the victim causes stress on the police officer.
Conduct research and write a paragraph discussing some of the effects Suicide by Cop can have for the officer(s) involved.
Locate a case that is clearly a case of Suicide by Cop as described in Category 1 or Category 2 in the article Suicide by Cop. (Links to an external site.)
Write a detailed summary of the case without plagiarizing.
Based on what you have learned in the chapter and the research discuss whether you feel this is a Category 1 or Category 2 case. Be specific and explain your choice by using quotes from the research to make your point.

89%
of clients claim significantly improved grades thanks to our work.
98%
of students agree they have more time for other things thanks to us.
Clients Speak
“I didn’t expect I’d be thanking you for actually improving my own writing, but I am. You’re like a second professor!”