Meanwhile, the Burmese’ readiness to eat the elephant underscores the desperation of their situation, and the way in which colonial oppression has made them focus on survival rather than moral outrage at the elephant’s brutal death.
ought, therefore, as the elephant was sideways on, to have aimed straight
at his ear-hole, actually I aimed several inches in front of this,
thinking the brain would be further forward.
Now the telephone rings; a nurse answers, listens for a moment and then hangs up. "On the roof," she announces, meaning that the helicopter has set down on the hospital helipad and that a healthy set of organs, a heart and two lungs, en bloc, will soon be available to implant into this woman, whose immediate fate will be decided within the next few hours.
I had no intention of shooting the elephant--I
had merely sent for the rifle to defend myself if necessary--and it is
always unnerving to have a crowd following you.
"Shooting an Elephant" is the story of a British policeman in Moulmein, a city in Burma, that is torn between shooting or not shooting an elephant that has gone ramped.
Shooting an Elephant essays are academic essays for citation. These papers were written primarily by students and provide critical analysis of Shooting an Elephant by George Orwell.
Some of the people said that the
elephant had gone in one direction, some said that he had gone in
another, some professed not even to have heard of any elephant.
Shooting an Elephant study guide contains a biography of George Orwell, literature essays, quiz questions, major themes, characters, and a full summary and analysis.
The elephant is the essential manifestation of nature in the essay; the descriptive language used to portray both its existence and its actions reflects a sense of greatness, even divinity, though there's no apparent religious aspect to any of Orwell's terms. What is important is that in contrast to the elephant's sublime beauty, its killing comes off as the worst act of vandalism, indeed, as Orwell says, "like murder" (34). Alongside the elephant are the primitive Burmese people whom we see living in thatch huts; we see children naked; they are represented in a way that connects them to nature. As the killing of the elephant is shown to be wrong, so too the subduing of the Burmese people.
service in the British Empire places his reasoned principles and his basic intuitions in constant conflict. He recognizes that the empire is tyrannical and abusive, yet he is unable to overcome his visceral contempt for the local villagers who mistreat him. The decisions Orwell makes when confronted with the rogue encapsulate these tensions between his different principles. Orwell could have followed his more humane, ethical impulses and chosen to spare the elephant. However…
George Orwell’s “Shooting an Elephant” is a powerful critique of imperialism. It shows that imperialism is harmful to not only the colonized but also the colonizer. How does the essay illustrate this point? Consider the characterization, description, narration, and other elements of the story in your essay
The unjust shooting of an elephant in Orwell's story is the central focus from which Orwell builds his argument through the two dominant characters, the elephant and its executioner.
“Shooting an Elephant” is filled with examples of warped power dynamics. Colonialism nearly always entails a small minority of outsiders wielding a disproportionate amount of influence over a larger group of local peoples. This imbalance of power in colonialism seems counterintuitive, and literalizes the imbalance by showing his ability to kill the singlehandedly. But even this distribution of power is not clear-cut: Orwell and the British colonists do not in fact have absolute…
The people said that the elephant
had come suddenly upon him round the corner of the hut, caught him with
its trunk, put its foot on his back and ground him into the earth.