The conclusion of a rhetorical analysis essay may not operate too differently from the conclusion of any other kind of essay. Still, many writers struggle with what a conclusion should or should not do. You can find tips elsewhere on the OWL on writing conclusions. In short, however, you should restate your main ideas and explain why they are important; restate your thesis; and outline further research or work you believe should be completed to further your efforts.
Actually all free sample essays and examples available online are 100% plagiarized! If you need a high-quality customized essay on Comparative Rhetorical Analysis topics written from scratch, you can easily hire professional academic writers online:
Summary: This resource covers how to write a rhetorical analysis essay of primarily visual texts with a focus on demonstrating the author’s understanding of the rhetorical situation and design principles.
This resource covers how to write a rhetorical analysis essay of primarily visual texts with a focus on demonstrating the author’s understanding of the rhetorical situation and design principles.
There is no one perfect way to organize a rhetorical analysis essay. In fact, writers should always be a bit leery of plug-in formulas that offer a perfect essay format. Remember, organization itself is not the enemy, only organization without considering the specific demands of your particular writing task. That said, here are some general tips for plotting out the overall form of your essay.
A Comparative Rhetorical Analysis is...
Identify the strengths and weaknesses of each article
determine how the tone, structure, and organization of each article makes it more or less effective
determine if sufficient evidence is presented to support the author's claim
Determine how you will structure your own argument about these two works
Present sufficient evidence (quotes and paraphrases) to prove your own argument about these works
Find and interesting way to open your essay
Create a "so what" to conclude your essay
Do not write about the "topic" of the articles
You should not talk about whether you agree or disagree with the articles' messages
You do not need to define logos, ethos, or pathos, rhetoric, comparative analysis, or any other word unless you honestly think the reader would not know what is means
Do not simply summarize the articles
a) identify two articles
b) establish connection between them
c) identify which one is more persuasive